Thoughts on recording and collaborative editing in Krita

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Monday 19 February 2007, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > But very easy to write tests for :-). And there are ways of making sure
> > that recording works everywhere, for instance by making all actions go
> > through a threadAction based action processor that optionally records,
> > executes and saves the undo information. The problem here is the
> > interactive tools. I'm not sure freehand painting needs to be recordable,
> > though. Is it in Photoshop?
>
> I am not sure we are on the same wavelength :D Yes freehand painting needs
> to be recordable. If it's just for automation of applying a series of
> filter and image resizing, recording is just a nice addition to a macro
> system. But the two other main usage I see for recording is colaborative
> editing (where you absolutely needs accuracy in the results and you need
> the information to be as small as possible) and tutorials (see
> http://www.portalgraphics.net/en/products/oc4/info/#event, since I saw
> this, I have dream of it in krita ;) ).

Ah, ok. I didn't exactly notice this, I was thinking of those Adobe droplets 
that I never figured out how to use.

> > Wasn't Sebastian Sauer working n a recording library for KOffice some
> > time again, btw?
>
> He is/was working on a macro library
> http://www.kexi-project.org/wiki/wikiview/index.php?Macros. Which could
> serves as an editor of what was recorded.

Ok.


-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20070219/896686fd/attachment.pgp