Request for review

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Tuesday 03 October 2006 12:02, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 11:45, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > Attached patch against 1.6 makes painting just that little bit more
> > faster that makes all the difference. I'd like y'all to review it before
> > I commit to 1.6, though, because we're really near the release and I
> > don't want to mess up.
>
> it will go with my patch (which is include in your diff btw ;) ) in 1.6.1.
> for .0 it's a little bit too late for that sort of changes.

Okay... I didn't remember the earlier discussion, I was just surprised at the 
uncommitted changes in my tree.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20061003/ce24dc5b/attachment.pgp