Move to graphicsmagick

Boudewijn Rempt boud at valdyas.org
Thu May 25 16:08:28 CEST 2006


On Thursday 25 May 2006 16:00, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > The only reason I haven't done so was because I thought graphicsmagick
> > wasn't packaged by distributions. If it is, or if we have enough clout to
> > get it packaged, I think we should do it like greased lightning.
> >From irc:
>
> 12:02 < isaac> 12:00 < Riddell> developers shouldn't not use something
> because it's not packaged, if a program needs it people will package it
> unless there's some obvious problem with it
>
> and I got flame for telling that there might be a problem, anyway, we
> might, for the moment, keep the imagemagick and mark it as deprecated, and
> have the graphicsmagick be activated over imagemagick if it is available
> and have a configure message to warn the user that imagemagick is
> deprecated and won't be maintained in the future.

Good. Feel free to take action :-) (But don't forget the new cmyk saving bug, 
that's a biggie for 1.5.2)

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20060525/b6f84839/attachment.pgp 


More information about the kimageshop mailing list