Kritacolor library re-licensing

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Friday 09 June 2006 14:42, Bart Coppens wrote:
> On Friday 09 June 2006 14:13, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > I'm hereby
> > officially asking for the consent of all the people who have their bit of
> > code in these files for doing so.
>
> Hum, of course I don't object to any bugfixes or so I made to the files,
> but I'd rather not relicense files created by me (those are
> kis_histogram_producer.* and kis_basic_histogram_producers.*). That in
> itself doesn't seem a big problem, since I always thought it wasn't really
> part of the core business of kritacolor anyway.
> Unfortunately, it seems every plugin depends on it for actually letting the
> world know the type of the histogram, even though it's a single line of
> code. Is there any way of getting around that without relicensing?

I bet we can add another layer of indirection -- that's know to be the 
solution to all possible programming problems. We'll have to investigate it, 
though, I remember I got horribly confused myself when I wanted to get rid of 
that dependency.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20060609/8eb7df63/attachment.pgp