Krita 1.6: my proposal

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Monday 06 February 2006 20:37, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > I know, everyone has their pet wishes for our core. Some of them need Qt4
> > (threading, opengl, dockers), others could be done with Qt1, like
> > refactoring the colorspace api once again or adding new iterators. But we
> > really, really need restraint here for 1.6. Endless refactoring does not
> > bring application stability, polish or breadth of features.
>
> I agree with you, no refactoring in 1.6 (whatever there is a 2.0 in
> parallel), as it would help to keep the core stable, and would allow to
> reduce the freeze time.
>
> But adding new class is just like adding new functions. I think so

But more involving. I think we should discuss new classes, especially new 
public classes on the ml before adding them to 1.6.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20060206/83a0505f/attachment.pgp