Substrate implementation proposal

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Wednesday 05 April 2006 09:50, Leonardo Giordani wrote:
> > Clear & academic is okay -- but now about the actual fields per pixel!
> > What do you propose?
>
> Yes sorry, I forgot that part...
>
> I propose the following:
>

I've checked in the basic header file, but not an implementation yet. However, 
that defines the substrate pixel. Could you check & if necessary/nice adapt 
that?

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20060407/6507f667/attachment.pgp