adrian at pagenet.plus.com
Fri Sep 16 16:58:20 CEST 2005
Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Bart Coppens wrote:
>>On Friday 16 September 2005 16:42, Adrian Page wrote:
>>>Is it worth considering replacing ImageMagick with the forked
>>>GraphicsMagick (http://www.graphicsmagick.org/)? Part of their 'mission
>>>statement' is to provide a stable API, unlike ImageMagick. Quoting from
>>Oh that sounds like it would be a blessing (especially because psn says it
>>doesn't compile anymore now). Unfortunately, distros need to ship it, and
>>apparently at least debian stable doesn't have it :-/
> I don't know any distribution that actually ships graphicsmagick, which is
> one reason why I didn't try to switch to it already. The other reason is
> that there's not much development -- not even bugfixing or feature improvement,
Oh, ok. That's a shame.
> and finally, I always thought that one day we would leave *Magick completely
> behind us.
I'm in favour of that too. I fancy doing libpng and libtiff based
filters at some point.
More information about the kimageshop