Sharpening twice

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Friday 11 March 2005 12:04, Casper Boemann wrote:
> we are not doing something to the background layer are we ?
>
> to touch it at all would be wrong

Very wrong... But I think that the convolution painter corrupts the bit of 
memory where the background layer resides, because if I comment that code 
out, everything goes swimmingly.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20050311/0bcacce7/attachment.pgp