picking up all changes from khtml-cvs, discussing changes less here

[Darin Adler]

On Nov 7, 2003, at 7:41 AM, porten at froglogic.com wrote:

> The two possible point of failures mentioned above would of course 
> already be caught if you were just monitoring khtml-cvs. To get 
> notifications saying that something has happened. This list would be 
> the place for questions and details then.

I think this is where our opinions may differ. It puts more burden on 
the recipient if he's expected to read the cvs log and ask questions. 
Conversely, it puts more burden on the sender if he's supposed to 
actively call attention to changes. I'd prefer to continue to use a 
"push" model rather than "pull".

     -- Darin