picking up all changes from khtml-cvs, discussing changes less here

[porten at froglogic.com]

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Darin Adler wrote:

> > P.S. Is everyone from Apple subscribed to khtml-cvs ?
>
> Some of us are, others are not. I'll subscribe right now.

Good.

> > All our commits are cc'ed there. Would make sure that all our fixes
> > can be picked up
> > automatically leaving this list for non-trivial changes to be
> > discussed.
>
> I don't think that's a good alternative. Seeing every last change you
> commit as you do it is not necessarily enough to tell us whether we
> want to take those changes.

I don't think that the log messages will be a problem. I rather see
potential problems with several incremental patches, fixes and reverts
being less effective to follow than accumulated patches.

Hmmmm. There were actually two reasons why I was suggesting this approach:
1.) we might forget to post a patch here and 2.) other KDE developers not
so deeply involved with khtml/kjs might not know about this list.

I, for for my part, am fine with continue to post things here. Reducing
the _discussion_ was not on my agenda for sure. We all benefit quite a bit
about another pair of eyes reviewing changes.

The two possible point of failures mentioned above would of course already
be caught if you were just monitoring khtml-cvs. To get notifications
saying that something has happened. This list would be the place for
questions and details then.

Harri.