JavaScriptCore merge & binary compatibility

[Peter Kelly]

On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Dirk Mueller wrote:

> On Die, 18 Feb 2003, Peter Kelly wrote:
> 
> > versions.  Actually KJSEmbed uses it already, there may be others too. If 
> > we can go with a BC solution to the Identifier and unsigned propertyName 
> > changes, this takes us some way towards that.
> 
> How many uses of kjs do you know of outside kjsembed ?
> 
> I'm all for keeping binary compatibilit, but not at any price. In this case 
> having a common codebase outperforms the disadvantages (proper testing of 
> patches to the code, something where we lag quite behind). 

I see your point. I guess given that it's not going to cause too many 
problems it's worth making the tradeoff, so I'll go along with it.

> 
> 
> Dirk
> _______________________________________________
> Khtml-devel@mail.kde.org
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/khtml-devel
> 

-- 
Peter Kelly
pmk@kde.org