JavaScriptCore merge & binary compatibility
Dirk Mueller
mueller@kde.org
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:22:28 +0100
On Die, 18 Feb 2003, Peter Kelly wrote:
> versions. Actually KJSEmbed uses it already, there may be others too. If
> we can go with a BC solution to the Identifier and unsigned propertyName
> changes, this takes us some way towards that.
How many uses of kjs do you know of outside kjsembed ?
I'm all for keeping binary compatibilit, but not at any price. In this case
having a common codebase outperforms the disadvantages (proper testing of
patches to the code, something where we lag quite behind).
Dirk