JavaScriptCore merge & binary compatibility

Dirk Mueller mueller@kde.org
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:22:28 +0100


On Die, 18 Feb 2003, Peter Kelly wrote:

> versions.  Actually KJSEmbed uses it already, there may be others too. If 
> we can go with a BC solution to the Identifier and unsigned propertyName 
> changes, this takes us some way towards that.

How many uses of kjs do you know of outside kjsembed ?

I'm all for keeping binary compatibilit, but not at any price. In this case 
having a common codebase outperforms the disadvantages (proper testing of 
patches to the code, something where we lag quite behind). 


Dirk