Bug #66958

[Hasso Tepper]

Germain Garand wrote:
> I think you can proceed with your latter patch.
> As for the konqueror bit, I don't use to touch that code, but I would
> say adding a boolean argument to prepareReload, and setting
> args.softReload from there would be cleaner (especially when it becomes
> an enum in trunk).

Like the attached patch?

Btw, it might be that userRequestedReload in KonqOpenURLRequest class 
would be pointless after this patch, but I wouldn't touch it in the 
branch anyway. 


regards,

-- 
Hasso Tepper
KDE Estonian Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: khtml-frames-reload-3.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 4636 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20070110/9c469532/attachment.patch>