KHTML, KJS Unfrozen -- details

[George Staikos]

On Wednesday 15 February 2006 02:01, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> > as well as the KJS_VERBOSE patches from me?
> > Thanks :)
>
> I would be glad to land KJS_VERBOSE patches. I have one flagged in my
> khtml-devel folder. Are there more?

  That is the main one.

> Attaching a patch in http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org and flagging it
> "review?" will almost always result in it getting reviewed and landed
> within a few days. I'm planning to set up a master bug to track final
> merge blockers, with a bug for each I know of, and KJS_VERBOSE is one
> of the items on the list (talked to George about it on Monday when he
> was in town).
>
> In the medium term I would like to propose something based on the LOG
> macro from kxmlcore instead, once we cut out the nonportable bits. It
> compiles out completely in release builds and gives you runtime
> switchable logging in debug builds (we'd have to test if it slows
> things down too much for the code to be runnable). Also messes up the
> formatting of the code a bit less.

  This seems to make sense to me too.

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/