Konqueror Compatibility Team proposal

[Rigo Wenning]

You will still get rich experience and might help the QA developers to have 
better validation, error message etc. Also, QA folks in W3C might even have 
(technical) resources and plans to help you with your work. In case of need, 
we are listening.

Best, 

Rigo 


Am Monday 21 August 2006 20:40, sprach Maks Orlovich:
> That's rarely relevant. Invalid CSS is discarded predictably. HTML validity
> only matters if it's truly horrible. By far and large the largest problem
> is blacklisting inside JavaScript, and reliance on implementation details
> and proprietary extension from IE and Mozilla.  The second largest class of
> problems is where we don't know which parts of "standards" to disregard.
>
> And I frankly don't see how doing anything with W3C will fix it in one way
> or another. If people actually gave a damn, they wouldn't be using those
> sorts of things.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20060822/8758431d/attachment.sig>