Traversal bic

[Leo Savernik]

Am Freitag, 12. November 2004 07:24 schrieb Zack Rusin:
> Essentially, I'm not sure whether it's worth fighting to keep bc in
> traversal. Comments?

I'm against bic'ing because this will destroy the trust of third parties in 
the ABI stability promised throughout a major version.

I'd prefer a hack instead, even if it's ugly.

mfg
 Leo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20041114/ec8f3b40/attachment.sig>