RFC: to backport HEAD or not

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

On Monday 08 November 2004 14:42, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I originally planned (and communicated this several times)
> to backport all development in HEAD to the branch. Several
> renderer fixes are definitely worth backporting and George wanted
> to have his kwallet fixes backported too. Also I'm not sure if
> gmail.com works in branch.
>
> On the other hand there were several changes that I'm not 100%
> sure. The document.all change and some features as the UA icon
> might not really be in the tradition of backports.
>
> I would still go for a complete backport _NOW_, but I would like to
> hear some comments from you.
>
I agree that it the safest approach is a complete backport, or as complete as 
possible. Though I think that is best to completely disable document.layers 
in the branch. The hiding hack needs more time to prove itself stable (the 
upcoming document.all experiment should do it).

`Allan