RFC: to backport HEAD or not

[George Staikos]

On Monday 08 November 2004 08:42, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I originally planned (and communicated this several times)
> to backport all development in HEAD to the branch. Several
> renderer fixes are definitely worth backporting and George wanted
> to have his kwallet fixes backported too. Also I'm not sure if
> gmail.com works in branch.
>
> On the other hand there were several changes that I'm not 100%
> sure. The document.all change and some features as the UA icon
> might not really be in the tradition of backports.
>
> I would still go for a complete backport _NOW_, but I would like to
> hear some comments from you.

  Go for it, and I can help revert the UA icon if you need.  I will backport 
the kwallet / kwalletd changes.

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/