RFC: to backport HEAD or not

[David Faure]

On Monday 08 November 2004 14:42, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I originally planned (and communicated this several times)
> to backport all development in HEAD to the branch. Several
> renderer fixes are definitely worth backporting and George wanted
> to have his kwallet fixes backported too. Also I'm not sure if
> gmail.com works in branch.
> 
> On the other hand there were several changes that I'm not 100%
> sure. The document.all change and some features as the UA icon
> might not really be in the tradition of backports. 

There is no document.all change yet. Only a document.layers hidden implementation,
which looks like it might be OK now.

I would suggest backporting all except the UA icon.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).