java patch

[Koos Vriezen]

On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, George Staikos wrote:

> On Friday 05 September 2003 09:26, Koos Vriezen wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, George Staikos wrote:
> > > On Friday 05 September 2003 07:35, Koos Vriezen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, George Staikos wrote:
> > > > > Does anyone else think this or something like it is a useful
> > > > > improvement to the error message?
> > > >
> > > > Dunno, JavaPath will be empty in most of the (failure) cases no?
> > >
> > >    Well that will be useful for debugging too, I think.  The user can
> > > know much earlier why it failed.
> >
> > Well, if you think
> >     Error: Java executable not found, or could not be started.
> >     []
> > make sense for a user. Will help with bug reports of course..I think the
> > patch should do something with an empty JavaPath (eg.
> >     [java executable not configured]
> > )
>
>   yes that's the idea.  I didn't commit it because it's rough, but it
> demonstrates the idea.  I think Java configuration is a bit difficult still.
> It might even be a good idea to allow the launch of the java configuration
> module if it isn't already configured.

I like that idea (launching kcm_java or whatever), that should save us
from all these bug reports :)

Koos