Konqueror delete unification

[Koos Vriezen]

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, David Hugh-Jones wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 12:18, Koos Vriezen wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry I missed that discussion. My point isn't really about delete vs
> > trash but more about where to put the trash. As said, copying files from
> > other (remote) partitions to my home dir, means for me I'm not going to
> > use it.
> > It's a 'how should trash work' discussion. I would use it if trash popups
> > with a question 'Hey /data1 or smb://companyserver/projects doesn't have a
> > trash installed. Install one?' and use that for trash. Or something else,
> > as long as it don't start copying files.
>
> Well, I haven't got a facility to install trash files on remote servers,

Yes, there should be a real trash app and not just a dir for it I
suppose..

> but if you try to trash a remote file, a message will pop up "Are you
> sure you want to trash this remote file" with options "Yes", "No just
> delete it" and "Cancel". And a "don't ask again" option. So if you then
> hit "no just delete it" and "don't ask again", it will change your
> delete option to "DEL_REMOTE" ie delete remote files, trash local files.

Sound great, but other partition problem remains (and I really think it's
not uncommon to have a partion for big files iso/movies/etc, for some a
vfat shared with another os) that makes default trashing in it's current
implementation useless.

Koos