Win32 Port of Safari

[Andreas Dieling]

> > How about fltk?
> > http://www.fltk.org/
>
> Fast Light Toolkit. Sounds about right. Thank you.
>
if i remember right, fltk is not using native win32 controls, but 
drawing its own controls in a gdc. I don't like it, because the 
application should behave like a real win32 app.

> A Mr Adrian Philip Look wrote to recommend http://www.wxwindows.org. He
> offered to answer questions, and pointed me towards the wxwindows 
> newsgroup.
>

wxwindows is cool, but classes are similar to mfc. So if you don't need 
platform independency, mfc would be faster.

> I've considered VCF. It is an ambitious project. I don't think it is 
> quite
> right for this port.
>
> Using a toolkit, for now, may make development faster.  In the end, if 
> the
> controls are few and simple, I might move towards programming directly 
> to the
> GDI for the sake of performance. Since KHTML already runS on Mac and 
> Unix, and
> extra portability layer will be unnecessary.
>

Its faster to use mfc then to hack win32-api. Or are there .NET 
bindings for c++ and visual studio6 ? Since .NET will replace win32 in 
the future, and i think it bids more intuitive object orientation than 
mfc.

Andreas