Win32 Port of Safari

[Alan Gutierrez]

Luis Pedro Coelho wrote:
 > Em Quinta 09 Janeiro 2003 05:23, Alan Gutierrez escreveu:
 >
 >>Oh, yes! VC++ has bugs! But it has caught a couple of stucts that were
 >>predeclared as classes, for example

 > <quote from="URL above">

<snip/>

 > That it is legal.  Both key words, class and struct, define a class --
 > there is no such thing as a struct in C++.

 > </quote>

 > Anyway, there is a more important question here. How far should KHTML's code
 > be changed to work around VC++'s bugs ? I would say not far at all. It can be
 > used as a tool to uncover bugs or an overreliance on gccisms but should not,
 > at this point, be considered a supported compiler.

Mr Ceolho

Fair enough. I am just raising the issues that VC++ raises. It is just a
warning and it can be disabled.

I appreciate the language instruction. Thanks you for the thread.

It doesn't seem that it will be that difficult to support VC++, for some
definition of support. Most of the stuff is working. They only major
departure that I have found so far is the lack the variable argument macros.

I understand that it we want to keep KHTML focused on KDE. I'll work to make
the Win32 stuff unintrusive.

Alan Gutierrez