[Patch] Webdav properties in UDSAtoms
Best, Jan-Pascal van
j.p.vanbest at tbm.tudelft.nl
Fri May 31 15:53:15 BST 2002
> On Fri, 31 May 2002 22:23, Best, Jan-Pascal van wrote:
> > Hundreds, or thousands of appointments? But it may not be so bad,
> > because after the first sync we can maybe check for the
> "lastmodified"
> > date.
>
> davOnlyRequestResponsesAfterLastModifiedDate? ;)
>
> (or something slightly more sane)
>
> Oh, btw, couldn't you do this lastmodified stuff with DAV_SEARCH?
;) That was the idea.
> > > The only thing to consider now is: when we are not requesting
> > > <allprop/>,
> > > should the additional propfind request be sent as a separate
> > > request? Or
> > > maybe as two <prop> blocks in the same <propfind>, if that works?
> >
> > Sorry,, you lost me there. If we are not requesting <allprop/>,
> > we only request what's in davRequestResponse, so what additional
> > propfind request is there?
>
> Well, if it doesn't also receive the normal dav items, it
> won't properly be
> able to return the correct UDS item to comply with the
> requirements of the
> stat.
I see, ok.
> For now I've just append the required fields onto the
> davRequestResponse XML provided by the app.
> The format of the xml provided
> shoud be that the opening <prop> tag is supplied, in case it
> needs to define
> any additional namespaces, but not the closing </prop> (so I
> can append the
> other elements we need), sound right?
Sounds a bit awkward, sending incomplete XML elements like that.
But I can't think of a better way.
> One question though... with this XML being in utf8, why are
> we using a
> QCString instead of using a QString and calling utf8()?
dfaure answered that.
> (Untested) Patch attached.
Looks good.
Cheers
Jan-Pascal
More information about the kfm-devel
mailing list