'continue' command problem
nickrob at snap.net.nz
Mon Jun 25 08:51:32 BST 2007
> I think your "async branch" is supposed to emit "^running" in all possible
> cases. Is that the case, and if so, do you think that improvement can be
> ported to gdb mainline quickly?
I've abandoned the branch but have a much smaller patch that does something
similar. It should emit all asynchronous records but I'm not sure what
what happens inside a user-defined command.
It's not really a quick fix for a specific problem but a different approach
to a more general one. The patch is at:
and there has been more recent discussion about it on gdb-patches this month
(Re: async patch (no. 4)).
I have a working copy so I can send you a current patch privately if you want
to try it out.
More information about the KDevelop