qmake, qt and license question

[Nicolas.Castagne at imag.fr]

Hi all,

indeed, basically, if your commercial application links against Qt, you do
need a At licence.

I would advice to visit the Trolltech www site, then contact trolltech by
mail, and see with them. They may perhaps propose a better price,
depending of your context - though still quite expensive.

Second advice : use another toolkit. The best choice I would adive is
WxWindows (recently renamed wxWidgets) : multiplatform, used a lot, C++,
sufficiently old to be large and stable. Still less fun than Qt, though !

All the best,

Nicolas

>    I understand the situation with the Qt toolset. I am just trying
> kdevelop
> and kdevelop designer. I have imported a ui from kdevelop designer into
> kdevelop. Pretty straight forward. I cant perform a build however, as
> qmake
> isnt found.
>
>    My question is: is it possible to use kdevelop and kdevelop designer
> without encountering the Qt license? (Commercial) What I am doing is
> commercial, but has less value than a single Qt workstation license :). Is
> there an alternative to qmake (using kdevelop designer) that doesnt impose
> commercial restrictions?
>
>
> Thanks
> Jim
> P.S.
> I'm new to this and may (probably) missed something.
>
>
> -
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe »your-email-address«
>


-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«