An IDE called 'QDevelop'

[Alexander Dymo]

> 2. I really fail to see whats so unique in "kdevelop" word that nobody can
> use "[A-Z]develop" from now on; it's obvious that people will presume its
> an IDE for QT (thats the first thing it crossed my mind) and I dont see any
> problem with that
I guess we can close this discussion. "KDevelop" name is not copyrighted
but to avoid confusion (about source code bases) I've asked QDevelop 
author to add a paragraph onto the website with explanation and 
I think that's perfectly enough (see http://www.qdevelop.org/).