stack problem

Ellen De Beuckeleer ellen.debeuckeleer at incgeo.be
Tue Jul 12 12:59:46 BST 2005


I will certainly try this! Thanx.

Reiner Beck wrote:

> Ellen,
>
> trying to increase the stack size is the wrong solution for your 
> problem. You should definitely try to reduce the size of your class, 
> as was suggested in an earlier mail. Just try to imagine what happens 
> if you copy the class over the stack (e.g. a "push_back()" in a STL 
> vector) - looming disaster. And more pitfalls to discover ...
>
> Try to allocate the memory in the heap - the change in your code is 
> not that big (even if you are supposed to change as little as 
> possible: the change will be a big improvement):
>
> Example:
> <code>
> class MyClass
> {
> public:
>   MyClass() :
>      myArray(NULL)
>   {
>      myArray = new int[myconst];
>      if (myArray == NULL)   // check if you got the memory
>      {
>         ::exit(1);   // or do something else
>      }
>   }
>
>   ~MyClass()
>   {
>      delete [] myArray;   // release the memory
>   }
>
> private:
>   int* myArray;
>
> };
> </code>
>
> HTH
> Reiner
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I use some extremely large arrays like : int myArray[myconst] and 
>> myconst can be eg. 1000000. My total amount of space required for an 
>> instance of the class is about 26,6 MB. I am reusing code which I 
>> have not written myself and I am not supposed to change to much.
>>
>> Ellen
>>
>
> -
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to 
> kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe »your-email-address«
>
>

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«



More information about the KDevelop mailing list