stack problem
Ellen De Beuckeleer
ellen.debeuckeleer at incgeo.be
Tue Jul 12 12:59:46 BST 2005
I will certainly try this! Thanx.
Reiner Beck wrote:
> Ellen,
>
> trying to increase the stack size is the wrong solution for your
> problem. You should definitely try to reduce the size of your class,
> as was suggested in an earlier mail. Just try to imagine what happens
> if you copy the class over the stack (e.g. a "push_back()" in a STL
> vector) - looming disaster. And more pitfalls to discover ...
>
> Try to allocate the memory in the heap - the change in your code is
> not that big (even if you are supposed to change as little as
> possible: the change will be a big improvement):
>
> Example:
> <code>
> class MyClass
> {
> public:
> MyClass() :
> myArray(NULL)
> {
> myArray = new int[myconst];
> if (myArray == NULL) // check if you got the memory
> {
> ::exit(1); // or do something else
> }
> }
>
> ~MyClass()
> {
> delete [] myArray; // release the memory
> }
>
> private:
> int* myArray;
>
> };
> </code>
>
> HTH
> Reiner
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I use some extremely large arrays like : int myArray[myconst] and
>> myconst can be eg. 1000000. My total amount of space required for an
>> instance of the class is about 26,6 MB. I am reusing code which I
>> have not written myself and I am not supposed to change to much.
>>
>> Ellen
>>
>
> -
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe »your-email-address«
>
>
-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«
More information about the KDevelop
mailing list