KDevelop status

[Holger Schroeder]

Hi,

the easiest would be, if you get the version changed in the sources, so that 
when you open the help -> about gideon dialog,
it says not only "gideon 3.0.0a4" but something like 
3.0.0posta4-cvs-2003-06-20 . it is your decision, how you want to name it 
exactly, but the important part is, that the date is in there. this way 
everybody, be it user or developer, can easily check which version he is 
running.


btw: i think gideon is already stable enough to call it beta, so a beta1 would 
fit.

Holger

On Friday 20 June 2003 17:11, you wrote:
> > Does this mean they will be "informal formal releases" without a name
> > (much like the source snapshots linked on the webpage), or will they be
> > named somehow? (KDevelop-3-20030622?)  I'm mostly thinking about the
> > confusion that could appear in the bug database, if they will still call
> > themselves alpha-4...
>
> Yes, they are basically dated "informal formal releases" like your example
> above.  It's a ploy to allow people to install from a package vs. having to
> deal with CVS.  Gentoo users will probably appreciate it the most, but I'm
> sure others will benefit as well.
>
> I haven't thought of a good way of changing any "naming" in the source
> itself to reflect the version.  If anyone has thoughts, please share :)
>
> Caleb
>
>
>
> -
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body: unsubscribe
> »your-email-address«


-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«