Dinamic link?
Andrew Skiba
andrew_skiba at mail.ru
Wed Aug 28 16:39:29 BST 2002
Hello Oliver,
Wednesday, August 28, 2002, 4:03:57 PM, you wrote:
OE> As long as I do not change the API of the older functions I can
OE> do what ever I want without having to recompile and breaking old binaries.
Neither you need when you link with a dll the way Israel mentioned in
the original posting. He does not need to load shared libraries
dynamically to achieve this.
OE> However it is agreed that using some plugin technique is more
OE> apropiate these days.
plugin is just a nice name for a dll or an executable which supports
some pre-defined interface.
OE> But it does not justify execution ;)
why not? you prefer running unknown component in its own address
space. do you have problems communicating to another process?
OE> So be a nice boy and let people do things the way they prefere.
people prefer to do things the easy way, not the right way :-P I am
sure, that using LoadLibrary is a design lack. like a goto ;-)
OE> oliver
OE> -
OE> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
OE> unsubscribe »your-email-address«
--
Best regards,
Andrew mailto:andrew_skiba at mail.ru
-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«
More information about the KDevelop
mailing list