Best KDE development tools... help... Borland Kylix?
rokrau at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 1 03:53:51 UTC 2001
--- Bernd Gehrmann <bernd at physik.hu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Furthermore, it has its own compiler and project management. You can
> not take a Kylix project and just recompile it on Solaris or even on
> LinuxPPC. This is what I would call a typical lock-in environment.
You are correct about the problem with proprietary compilers although
"good", "clean" code "should" compile on different compilers. Most
"GNU" code already has the problem that it will not compile with
"native" compilers. This is especially so when it comes to C++. So the
"lock in" argument holds either way.
> OTOH, the price argument is moot. $199 is a lot less than the price
> for a commercial Qt license.
Are you sure that you will get a commercial Qt license for 199$? Or is
this a license for the Kylix Qt wrapper and you can only use it from
Kylix "Turbo Pascal". Do you have any experiences with this?
In the garage of life there are mechanics and
there are drivers. Mechanics wanted!
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
More information about the KDevelop