qt libraires: fixed. g++ broken
Luis De la Parra Blum
luke at inferno.saturno.mx
Thu Apr 20 00:04:11 UTC 2000
> There's no qt-1.33 on any of SuSE's distribution cd's since 6.0, so maybe
> you just installed it over an existing distribution?
Nope, before I was using RedHat 6.0 and had another partition for windows. Then
I decided to give SuSE a try and installed 6.3, while I was at it I also
got rid of windows once and for all. that means that i repartitioned the whole
HD, so I don't think anything could be from a previous install =)
The qt (1.33) that I'm talking about was installed in a directory
/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib. I don't know, maybe they still ship 1.33 just in
case some old program needs'em, but yes, they are not in the QTDIR anymore...
hmm. I just checked it, and it came in a package called 'shlibs5' just in case
you want to take a look at it.
> > checking for Qt... libraries /usr/bin/qt/lib, headers /usr/lib/qt/include
> ^^^^^ > It can't be found in /usr/bin/* -
>there has to be /usr/lib/qt/lib. > Don't know how this could happen :-/ > IS
yes, it's /usr/lib/qt/lib and /usr/lib/qt/include, I made a mistake typing, but
that's, what i meant. sorry =(
>your $QTDIR set? > Check it with: > echo "$QTDIR"
yes, QTDIR is set to /usr/lib/qt, that was the first that I checked =)
> You need the pakages:
> egcs (or gccfront - _never_ both together!!!)
I got gcc, gccfront,gccinfo,gppshare,and libgpp. The rest that I mean when I
say that I installed almost all from there are a bunch of libraries that says
that are needed for "compiling and linking binaries that will run in SuSE 6.1
and others..." I re-checked packages dependencies, and they don't seem to
conflict with any other pack. but if you say so, I'll try deinstalling them...
> and everything depending on these and:
> (not together with qtdevel2 !!!)
that's exaclty what i got installed for qt. I had installed qtlib2 (run time,
no development) but I've tried uninstalling qtlib2 and nothing happens...
> No - not in this way - seems that you have broken your system ;)
Yes, that's what I'm starting to think =(, but it shouldn't be, I installed all
from the cd, and did a 'check dependecies' before installing,
and I haven't been playing around since the install (i just installed), so I
don't think I could have broken my system so fast =)
>some of them exclude each other and then won't work in the way they should.
yep, I know, but the pack. dependencies didn't show any conflict between the
thanks anyways Bjoern, I'll just keep trying, and if anyone has any other ideas,
PLEASE let me know..
More information about the KDevelop