Bug and idea

[Massimo Morin]

Hi,
 the idea sounds good BUT my member are all prepended by m_ so I have
m_data e non data (if it is a static memeber it is s_ )
The get and set function are done in this way (in my company coding
standard):
class foo {
private:
int m_data;
public: 
void SetData(int data) { m_data = data; }
int GetData() { return m_data; }
}

so as you can see we have different conventions! :(

Anyway, it should be cool to have that, and to have the BODY of the
method too (but careful on the = operator!).

Cheers
		Massimo

Joe Nelson wrote:
> 
> --bug--
> I declared a private data member like so:
> 
> bool data[][];
> 
> But it doesn't display in the classbrowser.
> 
> --idea--
> After doing the following by hand, I thought it would be a very nice
> thing to automate. The user enters in the name and type of a private or
> protected variable, then the variable is be added to the class along
> with its public get_ and/or set_ methods.
> 
> Does that sound cool, or stupid?
> 
> --Joe

-- 
                                               _...__..-'
Massimo Morin                                .'
mmorin at schedsys.com                        .'
+1 (617) 623-4155 expires  9/4           .'
+1 (617) 484-2999 starting 9/4         .'
            .------._                 ;
      .-"""`-.<')    `-._           .'
     (.--. _   `._       `'---.__.-'
      `   `;'-.-'         '-    ._     Scheduling Systems Inc.
        .--'``  '._      - '   .       Three University Office Park
         `""'-.    `---'    ,          95 Sawyer Road
 ''--..__      `\                      Waltham, 02453 Massachusetts USA
         ``''---'`\      .'            +1 (781) 893-0390 x 126
                   `'. '               http://www.schedsys.com
                     `'.