One more suggestion about ClassView

[Ansley, Michael]

Doesn't ctags do something like this.

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Carlo Sirna [mailto:carlo.sirna at digisoft.it]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 10:51 AM
>> To: kdevelop at fara3.cs.uni-potsdam.de
>> Subject: One more suggestion about ClassView
>> 
>> 
>> > > Christian
>> > It would be even better if you´d put public, protected and 
>> private member
>> > functions and the variables into a separate sub tree each.
>> > (maybe make this configurable?)
>> 
>> You gave me another idea!
>>  It would be GREAT to be allowed to put in the source code 
>> some special
>>  comments, like these
>> 
>> class MyClass
>> {
>> 
>>    // SECTION("User Interaction", "These functions are fired 
>> in response to
>> user interaction with the widget")
>>       virtual void onEntering();   // TIP("Fired when widget 
>> gets input
>> focus")
>>       virtual void onKey(); // TIP("Fired on key press events")
>>    // ENDSECTION
>>    // SECTION ("Widget rendering", "on screen drawing procedures and
>> options)
>>      virtual void Paint(); // TIP("Performs actual rendering");
>>      void SetBkgColor(TColor t); // TIP("Set background color")
>>   // ENDSECTION
>> }
>> 
>> This should allow to build a ClassView tree like this
>> 
>> class myclass
>>    |- User Interaction
>>    |    |-onEntering()
>>    |    |-onKey()
>>    |-Widget Rendering
>>         |-Paint()
>>         |-SetBkgColor()
>> 
>> I wish that sections could be also nested (this is why I 
>> proposed used a
>> begin/end structure).
>> 
>> While I was writing I had another Idea: inserting in the 
>> code some tooltips
>> (sorry for the windows slang, but I am still not experienced 
>> with linux GUI
>> programming...) to be showed when mouse cursor moves on an 
>> item of the
>> tree...
>> This is why the SECTION keyword has 2 arguments: the second 
>> is the tooltip.
>> 
>> but (forget tooltips) being allowed to define some grouping 
>> for the members
>> it would be incredibly useful... especially with classes 
>> containing tenths
>> of members.
>> 
>> C'mon guys...Keep on coding, you are doing great :-)
>> 
>> 
>>