glibc 2.0 and KDevelop

Werner Becker web at mpe.mpg.de
Tue Nov 16 08:30:28 GMT 1999



On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Rainer [iso-8859-1] Mühlhoff wrote:

> Bernd Gehrmann schrieb:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Rainer Mühlhoff wrote:
> >
> > > Does anybody know, if you can use KDevelop with glibc2.0 instead of
> > > glibc2.1?
> >
> > Sure. I'm doing that every day :-)
> >
> > Bernd.
>
> I'm now using a Linux system (DLD 6.0.1) based on glibc 2.0. I've tried
> to install two different KDevelop-RPMs (kdevelop1.0beta3i386.rpm and
> kdevelop1.0beta3i586.rpm), and everytime he misses soem files like
> libc.so.6
> libdb.so.3
> libftp.so.?
> ...

I also use the DLD 6.01 but I'm pritty sure that this distribution does
not include glibc 2.0 !

>
> The soure version of kdevelop also makes difficulties during
> installation.
> Are you shure using glibc2.0?
> If yes, what KDevelop Version do you use, and where can I get it?
>

I use DLD 6.01 and the installation of kdevelop is easy. If you
use src.rpm's take care for what distribution thy have been created.
Altough the rpm's will extracted in the right directories
/usr/src/delix/... it does not mean that they compile without problems
on your distribution. You likely have to check and edit the .spec files
in the /SPEC directory in order to apply changes necessary for your
system. These changes should not be dramatatic...

> Please arswer to rmuehlhoff at wtal.de, because at the moment I'm not a
> member of the mailinglist.
>

The easiest way, however, is if you simply copy the *.tar.gz files
of kdevelop, untar them into a directory and giving a './configure'
followed by a 'make' and 'make install' and everything should be fine.

Try it. It's not difficult. Tty it. Kdevelop is worth a try !

Werner






More information about the KDevelop mailing list