Moving KDevelop to Release service coverage?

[Sven Brauch]

Hi Friedrich,

On 10/20/21 8:22 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> So, who would be in favour, who would not be in favour?

I think this is a very good idea, currently there are just small changes 
happening in KDevelop mostly, which is very suitable for a 
slow-and-steady release schedule. If you feel capable of taking care of 
that, amazing :)

If the AppImage would be generated automatically as well that would of 
course be very good; do you know what would be required for that? We 
kind of have an automated process which does everything already, or is 
that too clunky?

Greetings,
Sven

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0xA4AAD0019BE03F15.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3139 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20211021/52d38980/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20211021/52d38980/attachment.sig>