Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes
luigi.toscano at tiscali.it
Tue Jan 31 19:10:42 UTC 2017
Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>> >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from
>>> Reviewboard to Phabricator for conducting code review. Sysadmin will
>>> be announcing a timeline for the shutdown of Reviewboard in the near
>> I hope that shutdown doesn't mean complete disconnect; it would probably be a loss of as-yet unknown importance if all code reviews become unavailable.
>> I'll miss ReviewBoard. Phabrithingy may be more powerful and versatile, but RB had its advantages too which could be why it's still being used (quite a lot, as far as I can see) and hasn't been integrated with KDE's own IDE yet.
> It will be a complete shutdown of Reviewboard - we'll be archiving it
> in the event for some reason it becomes necessary to access the data
> it stores.
Isn't it a way to change the site in static website and keep it alive?
Checking the history of a review can tell a lot. Also for discarded reviews.
> In most cases mailing lists should have the history of reviews in
> their archives, so those will continue to be accessible through list
> archives in the long run.
I think we should ensure to have the archives on mail.kde.org if this is the case.
More information about the KDevelop-devel