qtwebkit / qtwebengine

[Kevin Funk]

On Thursday, 27 October 2016 12:50:58 CEST René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday October 27 2016 12:32:12 Aleix Pol wrote:
> > What makes you think QtWebEngine is bad but the part works just fine?
> 
> I didn't mean to suggest that the part is better than QWE, but that if
> there's a need to a more capable HTML renderer it might be provided through
> a plugin, which could use the part to avoid reinventing stuff.
> > Anyway, this was recently discussed in a RR.
> 
> Do you have a link, please (or something specific to search for on
> reviewboard or phabricator)?

I think Aleix is referring to those change requests:
  https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126156/
  https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129224/

I don't have an opinion on QWE/QTextBrowser/qwebenginepart(?) yet, I haven't 
really investigated the different approaches.

Dropping the dependency to a full-featured web engine (i.e. going the 
QTextBrowser route) indeed sounds like the most viable solution at this 
point...

Cheers,
Kevin

> R.


-- 
Kevin Funk | kfunk at kde.org | http://kfunk.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20161028/1ce1c433/attachment.sig>