clang parser: can libclang be loaded dynamically?

René J.V. Bertin rjvbertin at
Mon Apr 11 14:27:37 UTC 2016

On Monday April 11 2016 16:03:57 Kevin Funk wrote:

> problems where there are no problems. 

Which reminds me a bit of a Bob Marley song ...

> Please have a look how 
> well-established distributions (Debian/Ubuntu/whatever) handle package 
> upgrades / package splitting / avoiding dependency hell / etc. pp..

I know Deb'Untu. That's on Linux, similar approaches do not exist on OS X and MSWin, to my knowledge.
Actually, Fink is based on apt/dpkg, but I cannot recall that they do package splitting.

> Please read [1] (or similar takes on that topic), then you understand why it 
> is "not that easy". It's common on Windows to compile *everything* from 
> source, since binaries produced by different VS versions are not interopable. 

Right, I tend to forget that clang/llvm are written in C++.
Oh well, "they" just have to build as much as possible against libc++ O:-)


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list