Review Request 125549: using qsortfilterproxy model to sort the variables

[rishabh gupta]

> On Oct. 14, 2015, 6:43 p.m., Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > debugger/variable/variablewidget.cpp, line 251
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125549/diff/3/?file=411022#file411022line251>
> >
> >     Do we need KDevelop:: here? We're already inside KDevelop namespace and don't qualify other names.

no kdevelop is not required .will change this


- rishabh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125549/#review86843
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 14, 2015, 12:55 p.m., rishabh  gupta wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125549/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 14, 2015, 12:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop and Milian Wolff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 119929
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
> 
> 
> Repository: kdevplatform
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> bug 119929 .sorting varibales list alphabetically using qsortfilterproxymodel
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   debugger/util/treeitem.h ec652c9 
>   debugger/util/treeitem.cpp 45cd081 
>   debugger/util/treemodel.h f121b56 
>   debugger/util/treemodel.cpp 9a7cafa 
>   debugger/util/treeview.h f6a6370 
>   debugger/util/treeview.cpp ae9f0e0 
>   debugger/variable/variablewidget.cpp 79f366d 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125549/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> built
> 
> testing done
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> rishabh  gupta
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20151015/3d64d5a8/attachment.html>