Review Request 125549: using qsortfilterproxy model to sort the variables
rishabh gupta
rishabh9511 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 12:25:46 UTC 2015
On Oct. 7, 2015, 8:27 p.m., rishabh gupta wrote:
> > Shouldn't it sort it without the proxy model at all?
>
> Milian Wolff wrote:
> no, afaik you still need the sort proxy. this line just enables the sorting features in the header view
just using setSortingEnabled doesn't work.
- rishabh
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125549/#review86461
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Oct. 8, 2015, 11:34 a.m., rishabh gupta wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125549/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Oct. 8, 2015, 11:34 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop and Milian Wolff.
>
>
> Bugs: 119929
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119929
>
>
> Repository: kdevplatform
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> bug 119929 .sorting varibales list alphabetically using qsortfilterproxymodel
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> debugger/variable/variablewidget.cpp 79f366d
> debugger/util/treeview.cpp ae9f0e0
> debugger/util/treeview.h f6a6370
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125549/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> built
>
> testing done
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> rishabh gupta
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20151008/2c91621e/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list