Kdev-clang master not building

[Kevin Funk]

On Monday, April 27, 2015 14:54:38 Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2015 10:37:04 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2015 10:05:28 Kevin Funk wrote:
> > > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 23:46:32 Aleix Pol wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Milian,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Milian Wolff <mail at milianw.de> 
wrote:
> > > > >> On Saturday 25 April 2015 09:46:39 Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > > > >> > /usr/include/qt/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1648:5: error: static
> > > > >> > assertion
> > > > >> > failed: Type is not registered, please use the Q_DECLARE_METATYPE
> > > > >> > macro to make it known to Qt's meta-object system
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Are you building KF5 yourself or are you using a distro package? I
> > > > >> cleaned
> > > > >> up
> > > > >> the KTextEditor framework to offer this in range.h/cursor.h there.
> > > > >> So,
> > > > >> if
> > > > >> possible, update your KTextEditor framework. Otherwise, I'll add
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> metatype
> > > > >> declaration again in macro guards.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is there a general consensus on wether kdevelop/kdevplatform is
> > > > > allowed
> > > > > to
> > > > > depend on frameworks master branches? That is, are you expecting all
> > > > > contributors to build kf5 from git until the first release?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Andreas
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > KDevelop-devel mailing list
> > > > > KDevelop-devel at kde.org
> > > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
> > > > 
> > > > It hasn't been discussed yet.
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe we could require the last KF5 released version.
> > > > In Plasma master, KF5 master is required and for frameworks the last
> > > > released version at the .0 release date.
> > > > 
> > > > The plan is to have distributions packaging newer KF5 versions as they
> > > > are released. (and it's already happening for Kubuntu and ArchLinux,
> > > > at least).
> > > 
> > > That doesn't match my impression of Kubuntu. And which I just got
> > > confirmed
> > > by Riddell & Harald on IRC:
> > > 
> > > - Kubuntu 15.04 is shipping KF5.9
> > > - It will very likely stay at that version (i.e. no updates),
> > > 
> > >   b/c of the manpower/"paperwork" it takes to update frameworks
> > > 
> > > - SICs or other compatibility breaks in KF5 doesn't make it easier for
> > > them
> > > to transition to newer KF5 releases, obviously
> > > 
> > > Honestly, I don't see the reason why we should break compatibility with
> > > KF5.9, which appears to be an attractive target given that Ubuntu is
> > > shipping it.
> > > 
> > > And this is for one simple reason: If people need to compile/install
> > > dependencies to work on KDevelop5, it's always a hassle for them (cf.
> > > this
> > > thread). Let's just make it easier for them.
> > > 
> > > I'll add the compatibility code to kdev-clang if no-one else steps up to
> > > do
> > > it (it's really not a big deal).
> > 
> > I agree. Sorry for the hassle I introduced here, I assumed people will
> > build KF5 if they want to try out KDev and thus we are free to depend on
> > the latest and greatest. Having a popular distro out in the open that
> > won't update for some time it's OK to uglify our code for half a year
> > with the macro guards.
> > 
> > Kevin, I'll do this if you don't beat me to it later today or so.
> > KDevplatform also needs it afaik.
> 
> Fixed now, please test.
> 
> Bye

Thanks for fixing, by the way.

Cheers

-- 
Kevin Funk | kfunk at kde.org | http://kfunk.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20150503/ace850d5/attachment.sig>