Review Request 120241: Add include path completion
    Milian Wolff 
    mail at milianw.de
       
    Wed Sep 17 10:00:29 UTC 2014
    
    
  
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#review66721
-----------------------------------------------------------
Nice, very clean code and the comments below are again mostly nitpicks. Thanks Sergey!
What's missing though are unit tests. Pretty please add some for that stuff.
codecompletion/CMakeLists.txt
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46510>
    this looks wrong. link against duchain where necessary (but not here).
codecompletion/includepathcompletioncontext.h
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46511>
    indent is off and dtor is missing
codecompletion/includepathcompletioncontext.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46513>
    '\n'
codecompletion/includepathcompletioncontext.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46514>
    QStringLiteral
codecompletion/includepathcompletioncontext.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46515>
    instead of this (which requires a temporary allocation), check whether slashIdx <= 1 and add a comment. should be the same, no? instead of .left below then use .mid
    
    otoh, this is only called rarely, so maybe just ignore this optimization. probably not required.
codecompletion/includepathcompletioncontext.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46516>
    I prefer this: `Path(url).parent()`
codecompletion/model.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46517>
    rename to `shouldDoIncludePathCompletion` or similar
codecompletion/model.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46512>
    indent
duchain/clangfilehelpers.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/#comment46518>
    missing copyright header
- Milian Wolff
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:28 a.m., Sergey Kalinichev wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 17, 2014, 9:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdev-clang
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> While the general idea borrowed from oldcpp, the code is mostly rewritten anew.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   codecompletion/CMakeLists.txt 6d6f9a8 
>   codecompletion/includepathcompletioncontext.h PRE-CREATION 
>   codecompletion/includepathcompletioncontext.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   codecompletion/model.cpp 114f885 
>   duchain/clangfilehelpers.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   duchain/clanghelpers.cpp 93f4298 
>   duchain/navigationwidget.h 8283bb6 
>   duchain/navigationwidget.cpp 97010c1 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120241/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sergey Kalinichev
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20140917/485b4292/attachment-0001.html>
    
    
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list