Review Request 121649: For headers, also use source-file include paths and defines.
Aleix Pol Gonzalez
aleixpol at kde.org
Wed Dec 31 11:34:00 UTC 2014
> On Dec. 31, 2014, 7:26 a.m., Olivier Jean de Gaalon wrote:
> > Rather embarassing that I didn't notice this sooner. I came up with a completely different solution: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121757/
> >
> > The advantage of what I have is that it should work for headers that have no buddy but are otherwise used anywhere in the project.
> >
> > Of course my solution doesn't actually work right now (CMake doesn't build targets, but that needs to be fixed?) so about this:
> > 1. This might useful in addition to the other as a "first guess" before any "target" TUs are found/created
> > 2. I /really/ think it would be better to use the TU of the cpp rather than merging the includes. Is that significantly more work?
>
> Olivier Jean de Gaalon wrote:
> What about creating a parse job for the source-buddy and waiting for it?
> As long as the source environment can beat the header environment it should stick?
(regarding cmake)
Well, the headers are extracted from the compile_commands.json file, we just have the headers separately for each .cpp file. In cmake you can have file-specific include directories so doing headers in a target scope doesn't make much sense in cmake (and I guess on others will be the same, e.g. Makefiles).
OTOH I have a branch with targets, so they do exist, but it doesn't seem they will get include directories information.
- Aleix
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121649/#review72812
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 23, 2014, 5:28 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121649/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 23, 2014, 5:28 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop.
>
>
> Repository: kdev-clang
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> We use the existing find-buddy-document architecture to find a
> source file corresponding to the current header file. If we find
> a match that also has a project file, we ask it for its include
> files.
>
> This fixes an issue, where when editing a header file Clang would
> never find the include paths. The reason is that in e.g. CMake,
> only the .cpp files have include paths, but not the .h files.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> clangparsejob.cpp 297b836128c441a7f6aacbac7ec175ca4bf7b8e1
> duchain/clangparsingenvironment.cpp 1decc1493eba5b81d18937ce43dd5c24ea6db01f
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121649/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Milian Wolff
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20141231/d582ae6a/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list