Review Request: [17/18] Finally refactor main UI

Ivan Shapovalov intelfx100 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 15 13:33:26 UTC 2012



> On Sept. 15, 2012, 8:26 a.m., Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Moved the tabs back to the top now due to the broken ui when the dialog is not high enough.

Hi Andreas! Are you going to merge this in some foreseeable future? ;)


- Ivan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/#review18984
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 31, 2012, 6:44 a.m., Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 31, 2012, 6:44 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop and Andreas Pakulat.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changes done:
> 1) Pass current project to the UI and pathes model.
> -> reasoning: they use it to relativize URLs
> 2) last-item-placeholders in pathes- and includes-model replaced by add*() methods
> -> reasoning: UI will use URL requesters to add new items
> 3) add a persistent (undeleteable; attempts to change its path result in creation of another item) "project root" item to the pathes model
> -> reasoning: usability - many people will want to do common per-project settings
> 4) make project pathes model URL-aware: clean/relativize pathes on adding, introduce custom roles to get full pathes/URLs
> -> reasoning: usability
> 
> UI modifications done:
> 5) replace listview of sub-project pathes with a combobox URL requester
> -> reasoning: less on-screen space
> 6) Replace stacked widget for includes/defines selection with a tab-interface.
> -> reasoning: usability - one can see all choices (includes and defines, maybe language features when they are merged) at once instead of having to open the combobox.
> 7) Use URL requesters and add/remove buttons instead of "Double-Click here..." placeholders.
> -> reasoning: usability - one may select a path without having to type it.
> 8) Add a button to remove selected include/define
> -> reasoning: in comments
> 9) Change various labels and popup texts
> -> reasoning: on-screen readability.
> 10) Clear inner UI on config set rather than before config loading.
> -> reasoning: robustness (when new configuration is selected, UI is cleared and refilled from scratch instead of overwriting old data).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configwidget.h ce9ba32 
>   configwidget.cpp 38bc551 
>   configwidget.ui d411d83 
>   custombuildsystemconfig.h 62901d4 
>   custombuildsystemconfigwidget.h d94e9fc 
>   custombuildsystemconfigwidget.cpp 791b7c7 
>   includesmodel.h debf278 
>   includesmodel.cpp ab42e16 
>   kcm_custombuildsystem.cpp 2f222bf 
>   projectpathsmodel.h d32bb92 
>   projectpathsmodel.cpp 6ee35b7 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing.
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> Before changes
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/s/654/
> New UI - idle
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/s/655/
> New UI - editing project path
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/s/656/
> Unusable tab-bar at the side
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105691/s/712/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ivan Shapovalov
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20121015/a462375c/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list