Broken categories in our templates or kapptemplate?

[Michael Hart]

Just did a "git pull" of kdevplatform and tried to build and it failed.
Then I did a "make clean" then a make and still got the following error:

"/home/XMan/Documents/Projects/kdevelop4/src/kdevplatform/language/codegen/applychangeswidget.cpp:
In member function ‘bool
KDevelop::ApplyChangesWidget::applyAllChanges()’:
/home/XMan/Documents/Projects/kdevelop4/src/kdevplatform/language/codegen/applychangeswidget.cpp:149:82:
error: no matching function for call to
‘KDevelop::IDocumentController::documentForUrl()’
/home/XMan/Documents/Projects/kdevelop4/src/kdevplatform/interfaces/idocumentcontroller.h:77:47:
note: candidate is: virtual KDevelop::IDocument*
KDevelop::IDocumentController::documentForUrl(const KUrl&) const
make[2]: ***
[language/CMakeFiles/kdevplatformlanguage.dir/codegen/applychangeswidget.o]
Error 1
make[1]: *** [language/CMakeFiles/kdevplatformlanguage.dir/all] Error 2"

I have been using gcc 4.5 in openSuSE 11.4

Michael

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org> wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de>
> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was just trying to create a new Qt/C++ CMake project but was kinda
> >>>>> confused by the categories presented to me. The left-most list was:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Python, Ruby, C++, KDE, Standard
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Naturally I chose C++ but that only has KDE (i.e. real KDE stuff,
> like
> >>>>> plasma, KApplication etc.) and and qmake templates.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I then checked Standard and KDE since the other two categories are
> >>>>> clearly not what I want. Standard has only a C++/Terminal with CMake.
> >>>>> Interestingly the KDE entry does not have a single KDE-related
> >>>>> template, all of the three are CMake/C++ Qt templates - one for
> tests,
> >>>>> one for gui and one for non-gui apps.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now before I whip up a bugreport:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is this categorization intentional as outlined above?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Should the categories in KDevelop or kapptemplate be changed? (I'd
> >>>>> personally fix the kdevelop templates to use the language as first
> >>>>> option too)
> >>>>>
> >>>> What KDE SDK version do you have? this changed some time ago...
> >>>
> >>> Interesting, still 4.7.4, thought I updated to 4.8 on that machine
> already...
> >>>
> >>>> The reasoning behind was that it's more clear to have what you're
> >>>> trying to achieve in the topmost level so that you can get all the
> >>>> options on how to do it in the end.
> >>>
> >>> Ok, so intended is to have KDE and Standard as top-levels? If so, our
> >>> templates are incorrectly categorized still IMO. After all a
> >>> QtCore-CMake-C++ template has absolutely nothing to do with "KDE".
> >>> Those would better be in a Qt category I think.
> >>
> >> Maybe so.
> >>
> >> Qt wasn't split because when this change was done there was a lot of
> >> the frameworks decisions going on. I think that what we should end up
> >> having is only Qt for applications and KDE for backends stuff, like
> >> KIO. Or not.
> >
> > I think I'm missing something here. Can you please look at
> > kdevelop/app_templates and tell me why those 3 rather simple
> > application templates are in a KDE category? I don't see how this has
> > anything to do with frameworks, even if we fast-forward a year when
> > frameworks are actually released those three templates are still plain
> > Qt templates that having nothing to do with KDE (or frameworks).
> > kapptemplate ships all the KDE-libraries using templates and I totally
> > agree that those should be in a KDE category.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > --
> > KDevelop-devel mailing list
> > KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> > https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>
> Well... there's been a lot of discussions about what is a KDE
> application and what isn't. That's what I meant.
>
> Aleix
>
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120823/abe3cb22/attachment.html>