Review Request: Preprocessor C++11 compliance in number parsing (tokenizer)
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
Sun Apr 8 17:34:58 UTC 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104508/#review12255
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Milian Wolff
On April 7, 2012, 6:09 p.m., Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104508/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated April 7, 2012, 6:09 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Changed preprocessor numeric value storage to "long long" as per C++11 standard (more precisely, N1988 working draft).
> Implemented parsing of numeric suffixes "LL", "L" and "U" in any combinations and parsing error reporting.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> languages/cpp/parser/rpp/pp-engine.h 9128ef1
> languages/cpp/parser/rpp/pp-engine.cpp 71f7f21
> languages/cpp/parser/tests/test_parser.cpp 3a4c7b9
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104508/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Unit-tests added regarding new suffixes, error reporting/detection and internal storage limits check.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ivan Shapovalov
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120408/c05b33fa/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list