Review Request: "noexcept" keyword parsing

[Ivan Shapovalov]

> On April 7, 2012, 11:31 a.m., Sven Brauch wrote:
> > You review your own review request? ;p
> > Anyway, looks fine to me, but I'm not involved with C++ language support, so you probably want to wait for someone else to give his OK on this.

I am not familiar with reviewboard interface. That was actually a mistake. :)


- Ivan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104498/#review12223
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 7, 2012, 11:53 a.m., Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104498/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 7, 2012, 11:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds initial parser support for "noexcept" and "noexcept(...)" declaration specifiers in KDevelop C++ parser.
> This is particularly useful with new GCC toolchain version 4.7.0, where these keywords are frequently used throughout STL.
> 
> UPDATE: Also, fixed preprocessor bug when numeric values ending with "L" failed to parse correctly. This is also related to GCC 4.7.0 toolchain support
> since there exist constructions like "#if __cplusplus", where __cplusplus is defined to 201103L.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 297604.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297604
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   languages/cpp/parser/ast.h 46ecac7 
>   languages/cpp/parser/codegenerator.cpp 962fe5b 
>   languages/cpp/parser/default_visitor.cpp 174e5d9 
>   languages/cpp/parser/lexer.cpp 0cdad1e 
>   languages/cpp/parser/parser.cpp 50c09a8 
>   languages/cpp/parser/rpp/pp-engine.cpp 2d0e9ea 
>   languages/cpp/parser/tokens.h 3e73330 
>   languages/cpp/parser/tokens.cpp 3d8c05f 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104498/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> A test file with intensive STL usage is uploaded.
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1) Open the test file in KDevelop 4.3.60 compiled from branch 'master' (commit 8c73677)
> See that "std::pair<>" is resolved as function with no return type; "std::map<>" and "std::vector<>" are not highlighted at all.
> 
> 2) Apply patches, rebuild KDevelop and clear your current DUChain cache
> # rm -rf ~/.kdevduchain
> 
> 3) Reopen the test file
> See that all STL typedefs and method calls are parsed and highlighted correctly.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ivan Shapovalov
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120407/739229b4/attachment.html>