C++0x support macros

Milian Wolff mail at milianw.de
Tue May 31 10:22:12 UTC 2011


David Nolden, 31.05.2011:
> Btw. I would prefer you to do most of the work in master (of course as
> long as all tests pass and you're only "adding" functionality).
> 
> I think, for a core contributor, a branch makes only sense for really
> large changes, or changes with temporary regressions, or experiments
> where it's unclear whether they will work or will be finished.
> 
> I think that the C++ 0x support will rather be a set of small, more or
> less independent, and incremental changes, each of which should go
> into master as soon as it's ready.

OK, I will merge it after each new feature then.

bye
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20110531/5537bede/attachment.sig>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list