constexpr - what features are wanted in the DUChain?

Aleix Pol aleixpol at
Tue Jul 12 17:50:53 UTC 2011

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Milian Wolff <mail at> wrote:

> Hey all,
> I wonder how I should handle `constexpr` in the DUChain. So far it is
> ignored
> completely. I think I'll at least handle the "Constant expression data
> variables are implicitly const" case.
> Besides that, should I also mark functions const when they are constexpr ?
> The
> latter is much more restrictive then just "const", so I wonder whether I
> should introduce a Constexpr modifier? Or should I just ignore it?
> bye
> --
> Milian Wolff
> mail at
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at
Well, it would be good if we had that information to create better checks...
otherwise we will have to gather this information elsewhere...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list