constexpr - what features are wanted in the DUChain?
aleixpol at kde.org
Tue Jul 12 17:50:53 UTC 2011
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Milian Wolff <mail at milianw.de> wrote:
> Hey all,
> I wonder how I should handle `constexpr` in the DUChain. So far it is
> completely. I think I'll at least handle the "Constant expression data
> variables are implicitly const" case.
> Besides that, should I also mark functions const when they are constexpr ?
> latter is much more restrictive then just "const", so I wonder whether I
> should introduce a Constexpr modifier? Or should I just ignore it?
> Milian Wolff
> mail at milianw.de
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
Well, it would be good if we had that information to create better checks...
otherwise we will have to gather this information elsewhere...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the KDevelop-devel