constexpr - what features are wanted in the DUChain?

[Aleix Pol]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Milian Wolff <mail at milianw.de> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I wonder how I should handle `constexpr` in the DUChain. So far it is
> ignored
> completely. I think I'll at least handle the "Constant expression data
> variables are implicitly const" case.
>
> Besides that, should I also mark functions const when they are constexpr ?
> The
> latter is much more restrictive then just "const", so I wonder whether I
> should introduce a Constexpr modifier? Or should I just ignore it?
>
> bye
> --
> Milian Wolff
> mail at milianw.de
> http://milianw.de
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>
>
Well, it would be good if we had that information to create better checks...
otherwise we will have to gather this information elsewhere...

Aleix
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20110712/b3c6ca29/attachment.html>